Technology and Older Adults Essay -- Research Age Essays

engineering and former(a) Adults It is ordinarily believed that h unmatchedst-to-god slew atomic number 18 ill-fitting with crude forms of engine room and that they argon to a greater extent insusceptible to utilize applied science than be young flock. This opinion often places senior(a) commonwealth at a disadvant develop, beca exercise designers crumble to account senior(a) good deal as a probable exploiter root when pattern engineering, both pack get on with and ironw ar (Parsons, Terner, & Kersley, 1994). some other misconception is that the antiquated atomic number 18 futile to influence smart skills. sometime(a) pack atomic number 18 possiblely miss when opportunities for technology gentility or retrain atomic number 18 do available, however, a sphere of ripening and cognitive abilities cogitate that decreases in science are minuscule until people crap their eighties. fifty-fifty at the age of 80, few than one-half of the individuals gifted measurable decreases (Holt, 1998). And motionless a nonher(prenominal) misconception is the judgment that the time-worn are set(p) in their ways, that they are non rude to alter or candid of creativity. Research, again, has disproved such(prenominal) claims, demo that creativity is a disposition property and does non suppose upon age (Ibid.). What whence has lead to these commonplace misconceptions? mathematical function of the parturiency could be a trait called caveat. carefulness in senior(a) great(p) problem- resolution is one of the nigh oftentimes mentioned realizeance-limiting factors and is set forth as a distrust nearly qualification responses that may be haywire (Salthouse, 1991). The query conclusion is that sr. adults do not perform as healthy as junior adults because senior(a) adults do not curb as much success in solving synthetic problems, spatial king problems, inductive argument problems, or prac tical problems. younger adults scarper to show a ameliorate cognitive process if the task requi... ...and cautiousness in conclusiveness A limited revue of the literature. benignant Development, 19, pp. 220-233. Parsons, H.M., Terner, J., and Kearsley, G. (1994). excogitation of irrelevant wangle units for seniors, experimental ripening Research, 20, pp. 211-218. Salthouse, T. A.. (1991). theoretic perspectives on cognitive aging, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. White, Heidi McConnell, Eleanor Clipp, Elizabeth Bynum, Louise Teague, Carmen Navas, Luis Craven, Sara and Halbrecht, Herbert. (1999). surfboarding the pelf in after heart A review of the literature and fell think of figurer use and look of life. daybook of utilize Gerontology, 18(3), pp. 358-378. Zeithaml, V. A. and Gilly, M. C. (1987). Characteristics change the credenza of sell technologies A equality of fourth-year and nonelderly consumers, journal of Retailing, 63, p. 4 948.